Conservative Institute – Right Report https://right.report There's a thin line between ringing alarm bells and fearmongering. Sun, 06 Oct 2024 14:19:29 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.2 https://right.report/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/cropped-Favicon-32x32.png Conservative Institute – Right Report https://right.report 32 32 237554330 NY Times’ Reversal on ‘Fact-Check’ of Vance Claim About Migrants Driving up Housing Costs Proves He Was Right https://right.report/ny-times-reversal-on-fact-check-of-vance-claim-about-migrants-driving-up-housing-costs-proves-he-was-right/ https://right.report/ny-times-reversal-on-fact-check-of-vance-claim-about-migrants-driving-up-housing-costs-proves-he-was-right/#respond Sun, 06 Oct 2024 14:19:29 +0000 https://right.report/ny-times-reversal-on-fact-check-of-vance-claim-about-migrants-driving-up-housing-costs-proves-he-was-right/ Following the recent vice presidential debate, the liberal media was quick to reflexively “fact-check” numerous statements by Sen. JD Vance (R-OH) as “false” or “misleading” when what the senator said was actually fundamentally correct.

One example would be a New York Times “fact-check” of a Vance claim about illegal immigration driving up housing costs, which The Times initially rated as “false” but has since altered to say the claim “needs context,” according to Breitbart.

That reversal of the verdict by the fact-checkers is a tacit admission that what the GOP vice presidential candidate said about migrants and their impact on housing costs was accurate.

Vance’s claim was true

The New York Times took issue with numerous statements made by Sen. Vance during the VP debate last week, including when he said, “There’s a Federal Reserve study that we’re happy to share after the debate — we’ll put it up on social media, actually — that really drills down on the connection between increased levels of migration, especially illegal immigration, and higher housing prices.”

Economics reporter Jeanna Smialek initially said Vance’s claim was “false” but has since changed that rating to “needs context,” even as her brief analysis remained virtually the same, according to Breitbart. […]

]]>
https://right.report/ny-times-reversal-on-fact-check-of-vance-claim-about-migrants-driving-up-housing-costs-proves-he-was-right/feed/ 0 227072
Malik Obama Says Brother Barack ‘Still Running the Country…’ https://right.report/malik-obama-says-brother-barack-still-running-the-country/ https://right.report/malik-obama-says-brother-barack-still-running-the-country/#respond Wed, 02 Oct 2024 18:30:11 +0000 https://right.report/malik-obama-says-brother-barack-still-running-the-country/ According to NYPost.com, Malik Obama has come right out and said that Barack Obama is “still running the country,” and would have “a big role to play” in a Kamala Harris presidency.

Republicans have been calling it out for quite some time, but America’s liberals want us to keep pretending like Barack Obama isn’t still heavily involved with running the country.

Come on, we’re not stupid! Joe Biden probably couldn’t tie his own shoelaces at this point, and we all know the only reason he got to this spot in the first place is from riding Obama’s coattails! There’s no way that Joe Biden hasn’t been taking direction from Barack Obama for at least some of the time he’s been America’s president.

Now, Malik Obama, Barack’s half-brother, wants us to know that things aren’t going to get better anytime soon if Kamala Harris remains involved with this country’s leadership. […]

]]>
https://right.report/malik-obama-says-brother-barack-still-running-the-country/feed/ 0 226851
Mark Meadows May Benefit From Supreme Court’s Presidential Immunity Ruling https://right.report/mark-meadows-may-benefit-from-supreme-courts-presidential-immunity-ruling/ https://right.report/mark-meadows-may-benefit-from-supreme-courts-presidential-immunity-ruling/#respond Wed, 02 Oct 2024 13:14:45 +0000 https://right.report/mark-meadows-may-benefit-from-supreme-courts-presidential-immunity-ruling/ In a bombshell decision earlier this year, America’s highest judicial body found that presidents enjoy presumptive immunity for official acts.

While the Supreme Court’s ruling is most relevant to former President Donald Trump, it could also impact one of his former staffers.

Former White House chief of staff files appeal

MSNBC legal blogger Jordan Rubin noted in July that former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows cited it in a brief filed with the Supreme Court.

Meadows was indicted last year by Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis alongside Trump and other defendants on racketeering charges over has conduct following the 2020 election. […]

]]>
https://right.report/mark-meadows-may-benefit-from-supreme-courts-presidential-immunity-ruling/feed/ 0 226767