Forcing Joe Biden to drop out to let someone younger and less senile take his place was supposed to give Democrats a shot at winning the White House when Donald Trump appeared on the verge of a landslide victory. For a while, Kamala Harris was succeeding, but the month of October was a disaster for her campaign. Now we’re seeing more talk about how the Democrats would have been better off keeping Biden.
“No matter who wins, we have to ask: Would President Biden have been a better candidate and choice despite suffering from the effects of age and 81 years?” asks Harlan Ullman over at The Hill. “Further, suppose that the disastrous June 27 debate with Trump had not taken place, or that Biden had been firing on all cylinders that night. Would Biden have been forced to withdraw? And whether Harris loses or wins, some will ask whether Biden might still have been a better candidate.”
Today’s politics remain visual, whether on television or social media with a constant flow of posts that millions of subscribers download every day. In fairness, Trump is an entertainer, showman and salesman. He may be overweight and wear excessively long ties while obsessing about his finely coiffed hair, but he gets away with it. And Trump, like the Energizer Bunny, seems to have unlimited endurance.
The physical comparison between the two presidents could not be more striking. That must favor Trump and in a small way accounts for some of his widespread public support. He is also interesting — love him or hate him, Trump is far from boring. The size of his audiences at rallies confirms that.
Gee, that’s weird. According to Kamala, his rallies aren’t big at all. […]
— Read More: pjmedia.com
