Theories Behind the LA Fires

Accidental or Random Acts of Chaos?

One of the more mainstream explanations suggests the fires began through accidents or natural causes—downed power lines, fireworks, or similar mishaps. From there, individuals in the city may have intentionally started additional fires, contributing to the chaos. Could mental health issues or opportunism explain this? Perhaps. But when you look at fire patterns and the sheer scale of destruction, randomness feels less convincing.

Los Angeles isn’t new to dealing with unpredictable behavior. But does this theory adequately capture the situation? Or is it a convenient narrative to sidestep tougher questions?

Guerilla Warfare: Quiet Chaos

Another possibility being discussed is that these fires could be part of a guerilla warfare tactic. Unlike terrorism, which seeks mass casualties and public credit for violence, guerilla warfare thrives on subtlety. The goal isn’t to make grand announcements but to destabilize a region over time.

Massive fires disrupt lives, strain resources, and create anxiety, all while leaving people asking “why?” Those behind such acts aim to weaken a city’s systems without drawing attention to the bigger picture.

Could these fires be part of an organized yet understated attack meant to fracture essential infrastructure? It may sound like a spy novel, but in today’s world, nothing seems entirely impossible.

Climate Change Narrative or Coordinated Agenda?

Blaming Climate Change

Whenever disaster strikes in California, the climate change narrative often takes center stage. It’s an easy backdrop for pushing legislation or targeting political opponents. Fires allow certain factions to highlight environmental concerns, propose aggressive policies, and point fingers at figures like Donald Trump or other political adversaries.

But here’s a provocative idea: what if the fires aren’t an unintended consequence of climate-related factors? What if they’re being used to steer the conversation and push for specific policies that align with larger agendas?

Clearing the Way for SmartLA 2028

The darkest—and perhaps most interesting—theory centers around transforming Los Angeles into the smart city of the future. By clearing away older infrastructure and “starting fresh,” planners could have a blank canvas to implement their vision of SmartLA 2028. This concept fits with trends we’ve seen in other locations, like Lahaina, Hawaii, which was rumored for smart city development after devastating fires.

Rebuilding after such devastation allows governments and developers to sidestep the usual red tape. Instead of going through years or decades of zoning battles and negotiations, the fires may provide an excuse to rebuild entire areas to fit futuristic goals. Los Angeles has already been a testing ground for innovation. Could the push for a connected, high-tech city tied to the Olympics explain why these fires seem oddly… convenient?

Gavin Newsom’s Role in the Rebuilding Effort

California Governor Gavin Newsom has been at the center of attention during this crisis. While many are critiquing his response, others see an opportunity for him to reshape his narrative. Newsom has already discussed working with Hawaii’s governor regarding land use after their own fires. Could his conversations about rebuilding and “improving” Los Angeles be a sign of plans already in motion?

At the same time, speculation about Newsom’s political ambitions highlights another angle. Many believe he’s positioning himself for a future presidential run, possibly after his term limit as governor ends in 2026. This crisis could be leveraged as a way to demonstrate his “leadership” amid adversity, turning public opinion in his favor over time.

While critics doubt Newsom’s sincerity, his ability to control narratives remains a strength. If the coming months focus on his efforts to “rebuild better,” his political career might gain, not suffer.

Why These Stories Disappear

Think about how quickly we move from one headline to the next. Just weeks ago, other incidents dominated discussion—New Year’s Day attacks, mystery fog sightings, or drone activity over New Jersey. Yet, those stories faded almost instantly as fresh crises emerged. The same may happen with the LA fires.

When combined with short public memory, shifting news cycles make long-term accountability difficult. Events like these often vanish from public discourse, leaving only the aftermath. Are we being conditioned to forget, or is this just a natural byproduct of today’s fast-moving media landscape?

What Comes Next?

Whether intentional or not, events like fires, disasters, or crises have lasting consequences. The idea of Los Angeles being cleared for smart city development isn’t definitive—yet. Still, the timing raises legitimate questions about what’s being planned behind the scenes.

We must stay vigilant and question how events align with broader agendas. Is SmartLA 2028 just a coincidence? Or, are we witnessing a carefully orchestrated transformation of one of America’s most recognized cities?

What do you think? Share your thoughts or join the discussion on platforms like X or Rumble. Let’s keep the conversation going!

• Did Gavin Newsom Inadvertently Admit to the Core Problem in California
• Biden Aids ‘Terrified’ Trump Will Deny Him a State Funeral
• Gavin Newsom Is Using Fire Fundraiser to Raise Funds for Himself
• Hollywood Mocked God a Day Before the LA Fires Hit
• Is Los Angeles Burning to Set Up SmartLA 2028

Our Sponsors:

• Long-Term Storage Beef (Promo Code “JDR”): https://prepperfarms.com
• Faith-Driven Gold Company: https://rumblegold.com
• Christian Coffee: https://jdrucker.com/coffee
• MyPillow (Promo Code “JDR”): https://mypillow.com/meds

It's actually far worse than just using ActBlue. He's DIRECTLY benefiting from this tragedy that he helped cause.

"Gavin Newsom Is Using Fire Fundraiser to Raise Funds for HIMSELF" pic.twitter.com/5OfsgA9aot

— JD Rucker (@JDRucker) January 12, 2025

Fundraising Through ActBlue: A Controversial Move

Recently, Gavin Newsom and Senator Elizabeth Warren used fundraising posts to solicit donations for fire relief efforts. But there’s a catch—they routed donations through ActBlue, a widely known Democratic fundraising platform.

Here’s why this is an issue. ActBlue charges a 3.95% processing fee. That’s money taken right off the top of every donation, funneling it toward the platform that ultimately benefits Democratic campaigns. And while that fee might not sound massive, it adds up quickly when thousands—or even millions—are donated.

People were quick to point out alternative routes for donating. You can donate directly to organizations like the United Way or local firefighter foundations. These organizations don’t skim processing fees that end up in political ecosystems.

But that’s where things took a darker turn.

Redirecting Donations to Political Campaigns

Newsom’s approach goes even further than just using ActBlue. His campaign has set up a site called “Californians Fire Facts”. If you visit this site, you’re redirected to an entirely different domain: GavinNewsom.com.

At first glance, this page might seem like it’s genuinely focused on wildfire relief. There’s information about the fires, resources, and, of course, a big “Donate” button. But here’s where it gets shocking. Clicking that button doesn’t actually send your money to wildfire victims—it sends it to Gavin Newsom’s “Campaign for Democracy.” This is a political action committee (PAC) aimed at boosting his political influence.

The funds that remain after ActBlue’s fees and whatever fees Newsom’s PAC takes are sent to the charities. But that’s just on the first donation. After that, it gets ugly.

Collecting Donor Data: The Real Endgame

If siphoning donations wasn’t bad enough, the true goldmine for these campaigns lies elsewhere: your personal data. When you donate through Newsom’s link, you’re required to provide your email and phone number. This information becomes a valuable asset, feeding future political campaigns.

Why does this matter? Because once they have your data, campaigns can continually reach out to you through text messages and emails. Imagine donating $50 to help fire victims and then months later receiving messages like, “Help Gavin Newsom continue his fight for California.” These pleas subtly encourage more donations, but this time, none of the money goes to wildfire relief—it goes directly into political coffers.

For campaigns, data is currency. Building lists of donors—especially ones compelled by emotional causes like fire relief—is a surefire way to secure long-term financial support. Many donors might not even realize they aren’t sending money to where they intended. It’s a bait-and-switch, plain and simple.

Ethical Questions and Accountability

The ethical implications here are staggering. Wildfires wreak havoc on families, homes, and livelihoods. Using that devastation as a platform for political gain crosses a line. Newsom’s campaign isn’t just raising funds—it’s leveraging tragedy for political advantage.

What’s even more troubling is the precedent this sets. If political leaders can blur the lines between charitable giving and campaign fundraising, trust in these systems erodes. People begin to question whether their donations are truly helping, or if they’re just padding the pockets of politicians.

Donate the Right Way

If you want to help wildfire victims, skip the middleman. Here are better options:

• Donate directly to local organizations. The United Way or the Los Angeles Fire Department Foundation are strong choices.
• Support the local fire relief funds directly. Find out which nonprofits are actively helping on the ground.
• Research before clicking ‘Donate.’ Look closely at where your money is going and what organization is behind the ask.

Your dollars should provide relief, not political ammunition.

Final Thoughts

Using a crisis to boost a political profile is beyond reprehensible. Whether it’s Gavin Newsom, Elizabeth Warren, or anyone else, this kind of behavior should disgust everyone, regardless of political belief. Tragedy isn’t a fundraising opportunity—it’s a call to act selflessly.

California deserves leaders who prioritize public service over personal gain. This isn’t that. It’s wrong, and people need to call it out. When you’re asked to give, take an extra moment to ensure you’re truly helping those who need it. Political games have no place in disaster relief.

In an interview on the liberal podcast “Pod Save America,” Newsom acknowledged the anger among those affected by the wildfires but highlighted that he has been struggling to get clear information from local authorities. He stated, “I’m the governor of California and want to know the answer,” pointing out his own team’s inquiries into what went wrong have been met with vague responses.

He said, “I’ll be candid with you, I wasn’t getting straight answers,” regarding his discussions with local leaders, which he suggests has hindered effective response efforts. Newsom has given these local leaders “a little bit of grace,” recognizing they are dealing with an “emergency environment,” but also noted that patience among the public is running thin.

The governor also took aim at Trump, with whom he has had previous confrontations, especially after Trump criticized Newsom’s leadership during the wildfires. Trump accused Newsom of poor management, stating, “It’s very sad because I’ve been trying to get Gavin Newsom to allow water to come – you’d have tremendous water up there, they send it out from the Pacific – because they’re trying to protect a tiny little fish.”

Trump’s comments refer to environmental policies aimed at protecting certain fish species, which he claims have led to water mismanagement during the crisis.

In response, Newsom’s office clarified that high water demand and ongoing fires have impacted water supply logistics, explaining that pump stations at lower elevations lacked sufficient pressure to refill higher elevation tanks, and fire conditions made it difficult for crews to access these pumps.

Steven Cheung, a spokesperson for Trump’s transition team, sharply criticized Newsom, suggesting he focus on his gubernatorial duties rather than deflecting blame, saying, “Instead of appearing on liberal podcasts, maybe Newscum [sic] should be doing his f—ing job and actually help people who continue to suffer under his terrible leadership.”

Newsom sees the writing on the wall. The people are seeing through the failed leadership that has plagued California for decades and he’s trying to position himself as one of the victims. Los Angeles officials did it. Trump did it. He’ll do and say anything other than accept responsibilities for his role in the unmitigated disaster.

Article generated from corporate media reports.

The city lacked the budget to adequately fill fire hydrants which allowed for the destruction of thousands of homes and the deaths of at least 10 people. Scarborough said it is still unknown what has caused Newsom’s administration’s “complete failure” to protect Californians’ homes and livelihoods, and argued that the lack of readiness by state governments to properly handle natural disasters has been a recurring phenomenon for several years.

“Happy Friday, if we can even say that with just the hellscape that is Los Angeles … We don’t know the exact causes for the complete failure of government to be able to protect these homes, I don’t think we can say it’s the smelt alone,” Scarborough said. “We don’t know what it is. But I do think it is going to be like Hurricane Katrina. I mean, the infrastructure has been slashed. You can’t just say it’s [Los Angeles Mayor] Karen Bass, you can’t just say it’s Gavin Newsom. This has been a trend for 30 years. Infrastructure has been slashed across America and you do have climate change, so you have wildfires sweeping into urban areas. They’re kind of like fighting the last war.”

“But I just … the longer we get into this, the more I think about how New Orleans didn’t invest in their levee system, how they didn’t invest in critical infrastructure, and people died because of it. It’s just hard to hear people say in one of the richest cities in the world say ‘Oh, we don’t have enough water to protect people’s homes,’” Scarborough continued.

An analysis from OpenTheBooks, a government transparency organization, found that the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP) lacked the budget to adequately fund fire hydrants despite having received substantial taxpayer-funded salaries. Several fire hydrants in the impacted areas ran dry and failed to combat the flames that spread across hundreds of neighborhoods.

Los Angeles Fire Department Chief Kristin Crowley committed significant resources to an internal “racial equity plan” and other diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives.

Over 100,000 residents in Pacific Palisades, Eaton Canyon and other communities had to evacuate their homes, with thousands returning to find their houses in ashes, according to the Los Angeles Times. Residents impacted by the fires told the Daily Caller News Foundation Wednesday that they were told to evacuate without warning and unexpectedly lost their houses and personal belongings.

EATON FIRE: Additional footage from today #California | #Altadena | #CaliforniaWildfires pic.twitter.com/FNUBvJMkm0

— Hailey Grace Gomez (@haileyggomez) January 9, 2025

EATON FIRE: Another shot from tonight obtained by @DailyCaller News Foundation. Being told winds are still pushing embers around making it incredibly hectic for officials to slow anything down. #Pasadena | #California pic.twitter.com/sqf1qlR3bl

— Hailey Grace Gomez (@haileyggomez) January 8, 2025

Democratic Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass traveled to Ghana for the inauguration of Ghanaian President John Dramani Mahama as the fires raged across her constituents’ backyards. Sky News reporter David Blevins caught the mayor off guard Wednesday as he asked if she owes an apology to the citizens of Los Angeles.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

• DEI Programs Are Ending but Woke Practices Are Just Being Relabeled
• Don Jr Drops Bombs on Squad Member’s Gaslighting
• ESG Is Not Dying, It’s Just Getting Relabeled
• Gavin Newsom Whines About Misinformation
• How Can We Stop AGI?
• LA’s Diversity Hire Fire Chief Points Finger at City of Los Angeles
• Mark Zuckerberg’s Apology Tour Is a Trap
• Was the Malibu Fire Started to Destroy Diddy Evidence

Our Sponsors:

• Long-Term Storage Beef (Promo Code “JDR”): https://prepperfarms.com
• Faith-Driven Gold Company: https://rumblegold.com
• Christian Coffee: https://jdrucker.com/coffee
• MyPillow (Promo Code “JDR”): https://mypillow.com/meds

But is this solely a case of city officials letting down their fire department? Or does the accountability extend deeper across all levels of government? Let’s break down the challenges, failures, and what this means for Los Angeles—and beyond.

The Ripple Effect of Government Failure

When a city as massive as Los Angeles experiences operational failures, the consequences are rarely isolated. This isn’t just a challenge for LA residents or even Californians. The financial, logistical, and economic impacts spread across the nation.

Home to over 4 million people, Los Angeles is the second-most populous city in the United States. A city-wide failure at this scale inevitably affects federal resources, insurance markets, and supply chains. Whether you’re in Miami, Seattle, or any other corner of the country, chances are you’ll feel the impact—if not directly, then through rising insurance rates or disrupted goods and services.

Budget Cuts and Leadership Decisions

Mayor Karen Bass has come under scrutiny for budgetary decisions that many argue have left the fire department inadequately prepared. Reports indicate that $17.6 million was cut from the fire department’s budget to fund programs aiding undocumented immigrants and other city initiatives. This is on top of an additional proposed $49 million reduction, which fortunately didn’t pass.

These funding decisions come at a steep cost. Firefighters are left without proper resources to combat surging emergencies, including the very wildfires wreaking havoc today. It’s a sobering reminder of how prioritizing certain initiatives over critical infrastructure can leave communities vulnerable.

A County and State in Crisis

Failures don’t stop at the city level. Los Angeles County has struggled to coordinate emergency alerts effectively, with reports of evacuation notices being misdirected to millions of unintended recipients. One glaring example saw Orange County residents panicking after receiving evacuation notices for fires nowhere near them. This disorganized response eroded trust in emergency systems and created unnecessary chaos.

At the state level, California’s government—overseeing what would be the fifth-largest economy in the world if it were an independent nation—seems equally constrained. Years of systemic inefficiency, bloated bureaucracy, and questionable priorities have left a state rich in resources struggling to meet its most basic responsibilities.

For many residents, California’s leadership doesn’t inspire confidence. It’s not just incompetence—it’s a consistent cycle of mismanagement that puts lives at risk.

Kristin Crowley’s Role and Accountability

Fire Chief Kristin Crowley has not been shy about criticizing city leadership. In interviews, she’s repeatedly stated that her department isn’t getting what it needs to meet the community’s demands. However, this raises an important question: Why didn’t she sound the alarm sooner?

Crowley’s focus on promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives underscored much of her tenure. While breaking barriers as the first openly LGBTQ+ woman to lead the department is a historic achievement, critics argue that her focus was misplaced when pressing resource shortages posed a looming threat.

If Crowley knew the department lacked the resources to deal with significant fires, she had a duty to sound the alarm much earlier. Instead, her energies seemed directed toward personal and symbolic achievements rather than advocating for critical funding. Whether this was due to poor judgment, incompetence, or political caution, it underscores a leadership gap at a crucial time.

Political Agendas vs. Public Safety

One of the most troubling aspects of this crisis is how political agendas appear to have taken priority over public safety concerns. Leaders like Mayor Karen Bass and others at different levels of government seemingly focused more on progressive programs than on ensuring preparedness for emergencies of this scale.

The result? A fire chief under-resourced, firefighters stretching themselves thin, and a population caught in the crossfire—literally. As the death toll rises, the consequences of poor governance become tragically clear.

What Comes Next?

The reality of this crisis goes beyond pointing fingers. It’s a wake-up call for Los Angeles and every city confronting resource shortages and emergency preparedness. Leaders must balance long-term initiatives with the immediate needs of essential services like public safety.

Without meaningful changes in leadership, priorities, and funding, this isn’t the last time Californians—or Americans as a whole—will bear the fallout of systemic incompetence.

Final Thoughts

Los Angeles’ current predicament is a glaring example of how bad policies breed dangerous outcomes. From city officials cutting critical budgets, to county mismanagement, to a state government riddled with inefficiency, every level of leadership shares the blame.

For Chief Kristin Crowley, the time to act decisively has long passed. Her acknowledgment of failure doesn’t absolve her of responsibility for knowing her department’s limitations and failing to raise the alarm months ago. Breaking glass ceilings is commendable, but leadership is about action—and Los Angeles residents shouldn’t have to pay the price for political miscalculations.

This crisis demands accountability, reform, and above all, a shift in priorities. Lives depend on it.

Video Summary generated with assistance of AI.

According to the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, as of Thursday afternoon, more than 1,000 structures have been destroyed, and at least five people have died. There have been nearly 13,926 total emergency responses, 92 wildfires and 29,053 acres burned, per the department.

Los Angeles has declared a state of emergency, and the National Guard has been deployed to assist the hundreds of firefighters – including many from other states – fighting the fires.

President Joe Biden has approved further federal assistance for Los Angeles County as the fires continue to raze homes, schools, businesses and other structures, in addition to scorching vegetation and wildlife in their wake.

“The President’s action makes federal funding available to affected individuals in Los Angeles County,” said a Wednesday statement from the Federal Emergency Management Agency. “Assistance can include grants for temporary housing and home repairs, low-cost loans to cover uninsured property losses and other programs to help individuals and business owners recover from the effects of the disaster.”

The White House announced late Wednesday that Biden will not be making a scheduled trip to Italy this week so he can monitor the raging wildfires in Southern California.

Speaking from the White House on Thursday afternoon during a briefing on the fires, Biden said federal funding will cover debris removal, setting up temporary shelters, and paying first responders.

“I told the governor and local officials, spare no expense,” Biden said in noting he’s surging federal resources into Southern California, including 400 federal firefighters, 30 federal firefighting aircraft and other assets.

The president provided some moral support as well for those enduring the fires that have turned portions of Southern California into a hellscape.

“We are with you,” Biden said. “We’re not going anywhere. To the firefighters and first responders, you are heroes.”

There was at least a brief respite on Thursday morning as the Santa Ana winds lessened somewhat, but forecasters warned that critical fire weather conditions would continue over the next several days.

While winds aren’t expected to reach the extremes of Tuesday night – gusts of up to 100 mph were recorded – potentially damaging winds remain in the forecast into the next week.

“High winds and low relative humidity will continue to support critical fire weather conditions in southern California through Friday,” the National Weather Service said on its website as of Thursday afternoon. “Red Flag Warnings remain in effect.”

The woman, whose daughter’s school burned down, approached the governor in her neighborhood demanding to know how he plans to aid the communities devastated by the five destructive fires that rapidly spread across parts of Los Angeles. Newsom claimed he was attempting to call President Joe Biden, leading the woman to bluntly tell him she did not believe he was about to call the president.

“Can I hear it? Because I don’t believe it,” the woman said. Newsom claimed that he tried “five times” to make the call, prompting the mother to ask why the president was not taking his calls.

“It’s not going through, so I have to get cell service,” Newsom explained.

“Let’s get it, let’s get it, I want to be here when you call the president,” she responded.

“I appreciate [that], I’m doing that right now and we need to get immediate reimbursements, individual assistance to help you. I’m devastated for you, I’m so sorry, especially for your daughter,” Newsom said.

The woman then asked Newsom why the state’s hydrants lacked the water needed to put out the fires. The governor assured her that he is taking all of the necessary steps to provide Californians with the necessary resources before cutting the conversation short and stepping into his vehicle.

“What are you gonna do? I would fill up [the hydrants] personally you know that,” she said. “I would fill up all of the hydrants myself. But would you do that?”

“I would do whatever I can,” the governor replied.

“But you’re not,” she interjected. “I see — do you know there’s water dripping over there, governor? There’s water coming out of there, you can use it.”

“I appreciate that, I’m gonna make the call to address everything I can right now, including making sure people are safe,” the governor answered.

An analysis from OpenTheBooks, a government transparency organization, said that Los Angeles lacked the budget to fund adequate fire hydrants despite the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP) having received substantial taxpayer-funded salaries. Several fire hydrants in the state ran dry as the LADWP and fire department officials attempted to combat the flames that destroyed thousands of homes, neighborhoods and communities in the area.

pic.twitter.com/IljfVSSNmd

— Hailey Grace Gomez (@haileyggomez) January 9, 2025

Los Angeles Fire Department Chief Kristin Crowley committed significant resources to an internal “racial equity plan” and other diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives.

Over 100,000 people had to evacuate their homes and at least five people have died, though officials believe the death toll is higher, according to the Los Angeles Times. About 1,000 homes in Pacific Palisades and the same number of residences in Eaton Canyon perished after the areas were set ablaze.

Residents told the Daily Caller News Foundation Wednesday that they did not expect their homes and personal belongings to completely perish, and that they received notice to evacuate without any prior warning.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

(Daily Signal)—I’m here in California. I’ve been a lifelong resident of the state, fifth generation to live in the same house. I had a house in the Sierra, and it would almost burn down three years ago during the Aspen Fire, and I’m speaking on the evening when you’ve all heard about the disastrous fire in Los Angeles.

As I’m speaking on a Wednesday night, there have been 15,000 acres, 1,000 structures destroyed. Nobody knows how many people are killed or missing. And how do we characterize this? Everybody’s talking about the Santa Ana winds, climate change—I mean everybody, the people in power.

But it was preventable. And once it started, this fire, it could have been assuaged. You could have had it lessened, that the severity didn’t have to be as catastrophic. So, I would characterize it as a DEI–Green New Deal hydrogen bomb. It’s something out of “Dante’s Inferno.”

And what I mean by that is, it’s a systems breakdown, a civilizational collapse. When you look at the people in charge, [California Gov.] Gavin Newsom flew in, to sort of do these performance-art stunts, but he has systematically ensured that water out of the Sacramento River and the watershed of Northern California would go out to the sea, rather than into the aqueduct, so Los Angeles didn’t have sufficient amounts of water.

He bragged not very long ago that he blew up four dams on the Klamath River. They provided 80,000 homes with clean hydroelectric power. They offered recreation, flood control, irrigation. He blew them up.

California’s fire management, whether we look at the Paradise Fire or the Aspen Fire near where I’m speaking, it destroyed 60 million trees. We have no timber industry in California. [Newsom’s] dismantled it.

We don’t clean the forest. We don’t let loggers come in and have a viable livelihood by harvesting trees. It’s sort of considered natural to let these things burn or to at least create the conditions in which they will inevitably be burned.

It’s almost as if we don’t like humans. We worry about grubs and worms and birds and the ecosystem.

The second breakdown was the mayor, Karen Bass, was in Africa. You tell me why the mayor of the third-largest city in the United States at fire season, when she had been warned and warned for days on end that the Santa Ana winds were up to 100 miles an hour in the evening, and there was a danger of fire, and she goes off to Africa for the inauguration of the president of Ghana.

With all due respect, Mayor, but who cares? You have an obligation to the 6 million people of greater Los Angeles. And then we have the fire chief. I don’t really care that she’s LGBTQ, I don’t care [about] any of that. All I do care is her emphases. She’s been bragging for the last two years that her goal was to make sure [the Fire Department] was diverse and inclusive.

That can be good if it’s competent. But when you announce that 70% of your hiring will not be meritocratic, but will be based on diversity, equity, inclusion, then you’re not putting the interest of your constituents first.

There were not even enough, there wasn’t enough water pressure in Pacific Palisades. Pacific Palisades is not where I live. It’s one of the wealthiest, most exclusive neighborhoods in the United States. If they don’t have water, then no one’s going to get water, believe me.

There’s not enough insurance. There were famous actors that didn’t have insurance. Why? Because industry is overregulated, it’s fraught with people who make fraudulent claims, and the insurance industry knows that California is hostile to it, but more importantly that it will never clean up its forest or take preventive, time-tried, ancient protocols to lessen the dangers of fire.

And so put it all together, whether it’s a deliberate policy to not store water, not preserve water. Last year was one of the wettest years that we’ve had. We’ve had three out of the last four years have been very wet. We had a huge snowpack. We had rivers that were running in 19th-century fashion, but out to the sea to save the delta smelt.

So, it was a total systems collapse from the idea of not spending money on irrigation, storage, water, fire prevention, force management, a viable insurance industry, a DEI hierarchy. You put it all together and it’s something like a DEI-Green New Deal hydrogen bomb.

Gavin Newsom was fiddling, as he’s almost Nero Newsom. And this has been something that is just unimaginable, this system’s breakdown.

And to finish, what we’re seeing in California is a state with 40 million people. And yet the people who run it feel that it should return to a 19^th-century pastoral condition. They are decivilizing the state, and deindustrializing the state, and defarming the state, but they’re not telling the 40 million people that their lifestyles will have to revert back to the 19th century when you had no protection from fire, you didn’t have enough water in California, you didn’t have enough power, you didn’t pump oil.

So, we are deliberately making these decisions not to develop energy, not to develop a timber industry, not to protect the insurance industry, not to protect houses and property.

And we’re doing it in almost a purely nihilistic fashion. And Karen Bass should resign. She came to the airport, back from Africa. She had nothing to say. She was confronted at the airport: “Why were you in Africa? Why did you cut the fire department?”

They cut the fire department by almost $18 million. They gave fire protective equipment to Ukraine’s first responders, and she had nothing to say. She had nothing to say because she couldn’t say anything.

I don’t want to be too pessimistic or bleak tonight, but this is one of the most alarming symptoms of a society gone mad, and if this continues, and if this were to spread to other states, we would become a Third World country if we’re not in parts already.